Photo Manipulation and Ethics

A. What are some of the main points you read about in the website above regarding manipulating images? Some of the main points that I read about was how if you edit the picture or not, the picture still isn't portraying the reality completely how it is either. So even though, yes, photoshop edits or changes the picture, the picture has already been manipulated.

B. What is the philosophy of newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York times regarding image manipulation? They have a rule that you can't change the colors of the picture in any way. In order for your picture to be used, you have to turn in your original photos and your final ones.

C. What do you think are acceptable things you could do to an image and not cross the line unto an unethical manipulation? I think that you could edit the lighting on the picture or jus edit the quality of the picture, but not placing someone else's head or changing the way they look because it's not truthful.

D. This picture is unethical because that is not her body. They just moved Oprah's head onto the body of another model. On top of that, they didn't even ask for permission before doing this. That makes the whole situation even more unethical because that is plagiarism.
oprah121
















E. This picture is the least unethical because they couldn't fit the picture they took unless they squished the pictures together and just moved around the placement. That is reasonable because it's not like you're changing a person, their body or how they look. This is different because they still have all the features there, the only thing that changed washer everything is and that's not even noticeable unless you find the exact picture on the internet except for it's spaced out differently.
nationalgeographic11

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Opinions Story

Opinions Writing Preview Activity